Can The Philips SC1981/50 Lumea IPL Hair Removal System Provide The Great Results Advertised?
The Philips SC1981/50 Lumea IPL Hair Removal System is minimal, small, and simplistic on first impressions but the more that prospective buyers read about its purpose and function, the more intriguing the product becomes.
The device has five different light settings, a skin tone sensor and allegedly “prevents hair regrowth providing long term hair reduction”, with the added benefit of “long-lasting smoothness”. This is a big promise but can it deliver upon it?
Are buyers seeing the results advertised and what specific advantages have they mentioned in their reviews for this Philips Lumea IPL Hair Removal Device?
The idea that it has been developed with the help of dermatologists and tested on over 2000 women is promising in terms of a good design and result and there are plenty of positive reviews from everyday users too.
To start with, the Philips SC1981/50 Lumea Comfort IPL Hair Removal System is a good size that makes it manageable and this is enhanced by the fact that it is corded and not rechargeable. There is also a simplicity to the model that is liked by some due to its small shape, lack of buttons and basic process – it may not have the reassuring beeps of other brands but does have a bright flash, a light body and the promise of six years worth of full body treatments in its lifetime.
When it comes to the results, there are reports of use on arms, legs, bikini lines and underarms and what is most interesting here is the number of reports from users about the effects on their underarms. This can be a bit of a hit and miss area but some go as far as saying they had their best results with this device.
The promise for legs is “75% hair reduction after only 2 months or 4 treatments and the results are mixed; some say there is a “dramatic” difference after the first session, which suggests that it can really get to work fast, and that hair can become lighter within a week. But others say reductions in regrowth are more gradual. The problem is that while quick results are clearly possible, increasing user expectations, every experience is different.
As experiences seem to vary and opinions are very subjective, what drawbacks should prospective buyers be aware of before purchasing a Philips Lumea IPL Hair Removal System?
The first problem is in the people that can and cannot use the device as the list of restrictions is quite long. There are general warnings about skin tones, freckles and tattoos, which some users found out the hard way.
One of the biggest issues is the warning not to use it after sun exposure, rather than the usual reminder about tanned skin, which leads to concerns about this only being a seasonal appliance rather than an year-round one.
On a related note, even though there is an integrated UV filter, some users suggest using eye protection because of the brightness of the light.
Another potential problem is in the ease of use: The “slide and flash mode” is meant to make things easier and it is just a case of holding down the button and waiting for the flash but it can be a bit fiddly on some areas and some users have called for assistance from a second person.
This issue can mean that it takes a little longer to complete a session, or a body part, in the time stated on the box – 11 minutes per leg sounds great but is just not realistic for some. Unfortunately, this does not seem to be improved with practice because the speed is also largely due to the small window for the treatment.
Summary: if it is quite time consuming and has so many warnings attached, is this Philips SC1981/50 Hair Removal System still a recommendable option?
There are some clear problems to address here, most importantly the high number of safety aspects and the time taken to finish a session and see a result. It is comforting to have warnings and filters in place but the restrictions do mean that this device has a small group that can actually use it repeatedly and comfortably.
If you have the right skin tone, a lack of tattoos and are able to fit treatments around sun exposure, the effort put into using the device could well be worthwhile because of results that can be achieved – especially with the reduction in hair regrowth and the speed in which it can be lightened.
The Philips Lumea is far from perfect in its design and does not have wide appeal; however, when it is suitable for use it is a simple device with a lot of potential and that is why it is still highly recommended.